[Mich VHF UHF Society] [NEWSVHF] 222 MHz FT8 - Inquiring 9s Wanna Knw

[Bob Bownes]

I'd suggest coordination with the WSJT folks. That way anything decided can
get integrated into the WSJT-X software. There is a very active mailing
list.

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Greg Cerny <greg at cerny.net> wrote:

> Perhaps putting the calling frequencies very close together would allow an
> operator to monitor both audio signals on one waterfall display of say
> 2.5khz bandwidth..... I know in Kansas there would not be overpopulation of
> the frequency with signals!  That would allow an operator to run two
> separate incidents of WSJT one for each mode and utilize only one radio...
> Greg WQ0P
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Bart Jahnke <bjahnke at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > A question has been raised as to what frequency might be a good watering
> > hole for 222 MHz FT8?  Anyone have a frequency they are using?
> >
> > If not, maybe 222.180 and 432.180 MHz might be suggestions as we enter
> this
> > new propagation year.
> >
> > Maybe same for MSK/FSK144.  Perhaps 222.140 and 432.140 MHz, or?
> >
> > Talk it up!
> >
> > 73 Bart W9JJ
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > NEWSVHF mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/newsvhf
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:NEWSVHF at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> NEWSVHF mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/newsvhf
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:NEWSVHF at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mivus.org/pipermail/mivus_mivus.org/attachments/20180323/f55a553d/attachment.htm>