<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr"><div>I agree.<br/>
<br/>
Ken - KU8Y <br/>
<br/>
<font color="#888888"><font color="#888888">Sent from my android device.</font></font><br/><br/>-----Original Message-----<br/>From: paul newcombe <g6yzc@msn.com><br/>To: Bart Jahnke <bjahnke@gmail.com>, VHF Reflector <vhf@w6yx.stanford.edu><br/>Cc: "newsvhf@mailman.qth.net" <newsvhf@mailman.qth.net>, FLWSS DIGEST <flwss@flwss.net>, "packrats@mailman.qth.net" <packrats@mailman.qth.net>, "badgercontesters@mailman.qth.net" <badgercontesters@mailman.qth.net>, "pnwvhfs@googlegroups.com List" <pNWVHFS@googlegroups.com>, "mivus@mivus.org" <mivus@mivus.org><br/>Sent: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 2:34 PM<br/>Subject: Re: [Mich VHF UHF Society] [Packrats] 222 MHz FT8 - Inquiring 9s Wanna Knw<br/><br/></div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
222.074 would be logical to me.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
better to keep it all all together in the logical order that it already is.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
There is far too little activity on 222 to be bothered about interference. Hell most of us would just be happy to see a signal on 222.</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Paul N2EME</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> packrats-bounces@mailman.qth.net <packrats-bounces@mailman.qth.net> on behalf of Bart Jahnke <bjahnke@gmail.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, March 23, 2018 8:43 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> VHF Reflector<br>
<b>Cc:</b> newsvhf@mailman.qth.net; FLWSS DIGEST; packrats@mailman.qth.net; badgercontesters@mailman.qth.net; pnwvhfs@googlegroups.com List; mivus@mivus.org<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Packrats] 222 MHz FT8 - Inquiring 9s Wanna Knw</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">All,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>A question has been raised as to what frequency might be a good watering hole for 222 MHz FT8? Anyone have a frequency they are using?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If not, maybe 222.180 and 432.180 MHz might be suggestions as we enter this new propagation year.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Maybe same for MSK/FSK144. Perhaps 222.140 and 432.140 MHz, or?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Talk it up!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>73 Bart W9JJ</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>